This campaign makes serious allegations. We believe they are well-evidenced, sourced from public records, and presented fairly. But we recognise that the people and organisations we name are entitled to respond — and that publishing their responses strengthens, rather than weakens, the public record.

We publicly and formally invite Digital Health and Care Wales, its CEO, its board, and any individual named on this site to provide a response to any claim we have published.


Our commitments

  1. Every substantive response will be published in full. We will not edit, excerpt, or paraphrase responses. If DHCW or any named individual provides a written response, we will publish the complete text on this page.

  2. Corrections will be made promptly. If a response identifies a factual error supported by evidence, we will correct the relevant page and note the correction transparently.

  3. Context will be preserved. Responses will be published alongside the claims they address, so readers can judge both sides.

  4. No response will be used against the respondent. Responding to this campaign will not be treated as an admission or used to construct further allegations.


How to respond

Responses can be submitted by email to carenhs@carenhs.org with the subject line "Right of Reply".

Please specify:

  • Which page or claim you are responding to
  • Your response in full
  • Any supporting evidence or documentation
  • Whether you consent to your response being published (we will assume consent unless told otherwise)

We will acknowledge receipt and publish responses promptly.


Responses received

No responses have been received from DHCW, its leadership, or any named individual as of the date of this page's last update.

This page was created on 13 March 2026. It will be updated whenever a response is received.


Why this matters

A campaign that does not invite challenge is not seeking truth — it is seeking confirmation. We have no interest in being unfair. We have every interest in being accurate.

If DHCW believes our evidence is wrong, incomplete, or misleading, this is the place to say so. The invitation is open, permanent, and unconditional.

Silence is also a response. The public can draw its own conclusions.